If any of the games receive updates, you might need to do some fixing.It's bad enough when game bugs out and you need to fix it by console, but when it happens to your campaign you've been playing for literally months, it can be really devastating.Conversion process is never perfect, so you're very likely to want to tweak some things with console commands or save game editing before and after export.I'd generally dislike ironman, but it's even more important not to play ironman for a few reasons: Since Paradox games make it hard to avoid blobbing, you pretty much have to play with mods, severe self-imposed restrictions, switch countries every now and then, or otherwise do silly things or your second/third/fourth campaigns will be pretty boring. Possibly even chain multiple such games, like CK2 to EU4 to Vic2 to HoI4. Paradox Grand Strategy games cover very long time, and most people never even "finish" a single game of CK2, or EU4 - but it's possible to go the other extreme and play a "megacampaign" - start in one game, then convert to another, and keep playing.
But for that Tinto needs to prove that they are capable of developing and executing a coherent holistic vision for their content.There's very little information about this wonderful thing, so after doing some research I decided to write it all up. I want paradox to let eu4 die when it actually is at a strong point and i would trust the team with making a good successor.
With mechanics designed without thinking how they interact with each other or existing content, heavily critizised flavour choices (german mission tree being a century or two early and just about everything portugal come to mind) and related issues i fail to understand how one could possibly argue in favour of eu5 (which essentially equals letting eu4 die) right now. While there are of course issues with tech the reality is that since Golden Century the complains have been mostly about design decisions, with the exception of Emperor and Leviathan launches (although those two are of completely different magnitudes).
EU4 VICTORIA 2 CONVERTER SOFTWARE
The biggest issue here is that a bunch of people with absolutely zero experience in software developing exclaim to know exactly what difficulties eu4 development is facing and why it is a problem with the games age (usually they blame the "old engine", while having no idea what an engine even is). While the sentiment became more widespread since golden centuries it still remains a very specific minority opinion and was actually voiced less after the CK3 release (when people realised thag ck3 might be a good game, but wasn't magically everything ck2 was just with all issues fixed). After a few weeks you will realise that it will always be the same ~5 people making those statements or new accounts who think they are communicating what they perveived as the majority.
EU4 VICTORIA 2 CONVERTER FULL
It has always been a handfull of forum posters going full doomsday priest, either out of dissatisfaction or misinformation and a bunch of forum newcomers accepting that as the "obvious" majority opinion. The same sentiment has been shown for years now.
Click to expand.Seems like you are new here.
0 kommentar(er)
